Discovery

Discovery is the pretrial process in which each party in a lawsuit obtains evidence from the opposing party through interrogatories, requests for documents, admissions and depositions. Despite its innocuous-sounding name, discovery has developed into one of the most hostile and burdensome civil litigation procedures in the United States. Originally designed to prevent trials by ambush and to ensure fairness in litigation, the process is now routinely abused by plaintiffs’ attorneys to burden defendants in hopes of forcing them into a quick, costly settlement. 

The discovery process was formally established in 1938 through the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As a practical matter, parties in U.S. cases are able to obtain far more information from one another than virtually anywhere else in the world. However, this freedom comes at a price, and the price is growing levels of discovery abuse. read more...

The most common types of abuse include: (1) demanding excessive amounts of unnecessary information, which imposes significant costs on parties to a suit, and (2) filing motions contesting the bounds of acceptable discovery instead of the merits of the underlying case. As a result, defendants face pressure to settle quickly rather than endure lengthy, burdensome discovery requests.

Discovery abuse has become particularly problematic in recent years due to the advent of electronic data storage. Not only has the volume of documents expanded, but the costs of producing electronic documents far exceed those of paper documents, as lawyers must review each digital file before it is released to the opposing party. This tedious and meticulous process has resulted in some large companies dedicating entire floors to attorneys reviewing documents to comply with requests – at a cost that can easily run into the millions of dollars, all without ever setting foot in a courtroom. It is therefore no surprise that discovery ranks as one of the top litigation concern for many businesses. 

The federal judiciary is considering changes to alleviate some of the burdens of discovery, but these proposed changes only begin to address the root of the problem. Reasonable rules should include prohibiting the gathering of information until a court has ruled on any motions to dismiss and determined that a case has merit. Parties to a suit should also be required to pay the costs of the information they request, subject to adjustments where appropriate. Ultimately, sensible changes would streamline the discovery process and discourage attorneys from abusing the system to shake down American businesses.

 

All Results for Discovery

In the News Today - February 25, 2014

February 25, 2014 | Insights

With discovery accounting for 50 to 90 percent of litigation costs, the federal Advisory Committee on Civil Rules is considering changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that would narrow pretrial discovery burdens. Read More »

Tags: Class Actions, Discovery, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

Kyl: Reforms Needed to Ease Discovery Burden

January 21, 2014 | Insights

Excessive litigation costs are hurting American companies and scaring foreign companies away from investing in the U.S., writes former Senator Jon Kyl in the Wall Street Journal. Read More »

Tags: Discovery

In the News Today - January 8, 2014

January 08, 2014 | Insights

Drafters of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act filed an amicus brief in the Halliburton fraud-on-the-market case, writing that the 1995 law did not address the theory. Read More »

Tags: Discovery, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Securities Litigation Reform

Congress Takes Up Skyrocketing Costs of E-Discovery

November 06, 2013 | Insights

A Congressional hearing looked at possible reforms that are intended to reduce the time and cost of civil litigation. Read More »

Tags: Discovery

Taking the Sting Out of Discovery: Improving the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

October 24, 2013 | Video

At the 14th Annual Legal Reform Summit, Counsel for Civil Justice Reform and Law Technology at ExxonMobil Corporation Robert L. Levy spoke on ways to improve the federal rules of civil procedure. Watch »

Tags: Discovery

U.S. Chamber Hails Introduction of Exculpatory Evidence Bill in U.S. Senate

March 15, 2012 | Press Release

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Lisa A. Rickard, president of the U.S. Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform (ILR), issued the following statement today regarding the introduction of the Fairness in Disclosure of Evidence Act of 2012 in the U.S. Senate. The bill would require that federal prosecutors disclose evidence that is favorable to the defendant in the course of a criminal proceeding; outline when such evidence must be disclosed; and, provide meaningful remedies for violations of the rule. Read More »

Tags: Discovery

Understanding E-Discovery

Author: Rebecca Love Kourlis | July 21, 2008 | Press Release

In our President's Corner today, we are featuring a guest columnist. Rebecca Love Kourlis is a former Colorado Supreme Court Justice and now serves as the Executive Director at the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System, a national organization dedicated to improving the process and culture of the civil justice system. Justice Kourlis will be speaking about e-discovery at the Institute for Legal Reform's "Drowning in Documents" conference on July 30th. The conference will explore the explosion of discovery and its impact on the fairness and efficiency of American courts. Registration is now open for the morning discovery conference or the employment litigation event that afternoon. Read More »

Tags: Discovery

  • bulletClick to Narrow Your Results
    Narrow Your Search Results
    Content Type Select All| Clear All
    Publication Date

    Select Custom Range

    Browse Another Issue