Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)

  • Home >
  • Issues >
  • Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)

Enacted in 1977, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) makes it illegal for U.S. citizens, U.S. companies and certain foreign companies to bribe a foreign government official in order to obtain or retain business. However, despite the law’s good intentions, the government’s recent FCPA enforcement practices have created major uncertainty for American businesses and highlighted the need for reforms. Read More...

Since the FCPA was enacted, trade’s importance to the U.S. economy (as a percentage of GDP) has grown more than fifty percent, and exports of U.S. goods exceeded $2 trillion in 2012. At the same time, foreign governments have increasingly enmeshed themselves in private businesses. 

Unfortunately, the FCPA has not evolved to reflect these changes in the global economy – creating unprecedented uncertainty for American businesses selling goods and services overseas. They are now exposed to civil and criminal penalties for conduct that is, in many cases, beyond their control and knowledge.

For example, when an employee of an American company takes an employee of a company partially owned by the Chinese government to lunch or pays for his cab ride, does that constitute an FCPA violation? And what happens when a rogue employee knowingly violates a company’s internal FCPA compliance system? Should the company be held liable too?

To help address these and other questions, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission released unprecedented joint guidance on their enforcement of the FCPA in November 2012. While this guidance was an important first step towards providing businesses with much-needed clarity and certainty, more reforms are needed. These include ensuring that U.S. companies implementing robust anti-bribery programs are not punished for the actions of rogue employees. The government should also provide a clearer definition of who constitutes a “foreign official” under the statute. Even more recently, the DOJ released in late 2017 additional guidance and changes to the U.S. Attorney's Manual indicating that the Department will presumptively decline to prosecute FCPA cases against companies that voluntarily disclose potential misconduct, fully cooperate with government investigators, and implement timely and appropriate remediation measures.

Suggested Resources

Research
  • ILR Research Review - Fall 2017

    ILR Research Review - Fall 2017

    November 30, 2017

    This special double-issue of the ILR Research Review features a wealth of insight and analysis on the world's rapidly changing litigation environment. The research contained in this issue targets exploitative litigation at home and abroad, examining numerous developments ranging from hyper-aggressive trial lawyer advertising in the U.S. to the imminent expansion of class actions in Europe. Read More

  • DOJ's New Threshold for

    DOJ's New Threshold for "Cooperation": Challenges Posed by the Yates Memo and USAM Revisions

    May 26, 2016

    This paper examines the recent release of the Yates Memo, changes to the U.S. Attorneys' Manual (USAM), and the complicated landscape for business compliance and cooperation. Read More

Additional Resources

All Results for Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)

  1. Restoring Balance: Proposed Amendments to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

    October 27, 2010 | Research

    This paper presents a series of amendments that would serve to improve the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ('FCPA'). That statute was enacted by Congress and signed into law by President Carter in late 1977. Congress's primary aim in enacting the FCPA was to prohibit U.S. companies and companies operating in the U.S. from paying bribes to foreign government officials, politicians, and political parties for the purpose of obtaining business opportunities abroad.... Read More