U.S. Chamber of Commerce link

Trial Lawyers' Influence

Personal injury lawsuits and other tort claims represent a $40 billion per year industry built upon the abuse and misuse of America’s legal system by contingency-fee lawyers. While these trial lawyers (or plaintiffs’ lawyers or personal injury lawyers) have long claimed to champion “the little guy,” their injured and uninjured plaintiffs are often drawn into a legal process that primarily just expands trial lawyers’ finances and political power.

The Lawsuit Abuse Cycle

The abusive business strategy used by many plaintiffs’ lawyers involves:

– Expanding the scope of civil law to create new forms of lawsuits

– Building wealth using lawsuits and the threat of lawsuits against wealthy defendants

– Using the additional wealth to build political strength to support efforts to start the cycle again

– As billionaire trial lawyer Dickie Scruggs explains, plaintiffs’ lawyers find courtrooms, or “magic jurisdictions,” as he calls them, where the judge is friendly to the plaintiffs’ bar and where personal relationships often seem to outweigh the law. Therefore, huge verdicts can easily be won against out-of-town defendants with deep pockets.

– Areas that have been targeted for abuse by the plaintiffs’ bar are often those with the least fair and reasonable litigation environments (see page 18 of the 2006 U.S. Chamber of Commerce State Liability Systems Ranking Study).

Lawsuit Profits Build Venture Capital and Political Capital

The political power of plaintiffs’ lawyers expanded greatly beginning with the tobacco lawsuit settlement, when billions were paid to plaintiff lawyer firms. Since then, tobacco has been supplanted by handguns, lead paint, cheeseburgers, mold and various other targeted issues for “money-making” lawsuits.

The finances plaintiffs’ lawyers take in from lawsuits can become “seed money” for expanding a political base and investing in the next type of novel lawsuit. Many state judges, legislators, and governors, as well as Members of Congress, have been elected based on campaign money raised from the plaintiffs’ bar.

Moreover, trial lawyers are lobbying powerhouses in Congress and state capitols across the country. Using their unrivaled political influence, plaintiff lawyers frequently block common-sense legal reforms from being enacted and help preserve the out-of-control status quo that they find too profitable to abandon.

Trial Lawyer Influence Litigation Impact
Our Legal System Takes a Hit:

In addition to finding friendly courtrooms and using money to build political power, other tactics of the plaintiffs’ bar include:

– Building huge plaintiff classes in class action lawsuits to increase court awards and settlements

– Using unsubstantiated science and novel legal theories to create new classes of plaintiffs and new bodies of “evidence”

– Partnering with state attorneys general in order to file lawsuits on behalf of government entities


o As just one example of class action abuse and trial lawyer greed, a lawsuit over movie rentals resulted in class members receiving only coupons for future movie rentals while their lawyers received $9 million in fees and expenses.

As trial lawyers’ wealth and political influence are used to manipulate our legal system, American citizens pay the price – through lost job opportunities, diminished access to healthcare, higher consumer prices and reduced access to courtrooms filled with frivolous cases. The overall high cost of our tort system means that every American pays an average of $835 annually, according to Tillinghast/TowersPerrin’s annual report on the costs of the U.S. legal system (Read Tillinghast/TowersPerrin’s 2008 update on U.S. Tort Costs.) Americans will continue to pay the price until trial lawyers’ abuses of the legal system are reined in once and for all.

Issue Resources: Trial Lawyers' Influence

101 Ways To Improve State Legal Systems in 2012 and Beyond

This user's guide to promoting fair and effective civil justice provides policymakers with a compilation of some of the many avenues available to fostering a sound legal system that promotes states’ economies. The reforms are organized into five areas. The first section highlights five reforms that have gained momentum and should be of particular interest to state legislators. The report then considers fair and effective measures that would improve the litigation process, improve product liability law, promote rational liability rules, and rein in excessive damage awards. LEARN MORE »

Download Now

The Plaintiffs' Bar Goes Digital

This study of how plaintiffs’ lawyers market their services online reveals some of the most sophisticated, high-dollar tactics of any commercial industry. The study details how many plaintiffs’ firms create and dispatch a wide variety of websites and use social media tools such as Twitter and Facebook to create a complex web of information presented in a broad variety of ways, all designed to attract and vet potential clients for lawsuits. LEARN MORE »

Download Now

About the Panel: Trial Bar Trends We Don't Want to Continue

At the 12th Annual Legal Reform Summit on October 26, 2011, Katherine L. Adams, the Senior Vice President and General Counsel at Honeywell International, Inc., took part in a panel discussion entitled "Trends We Don't Want To Continue: A Look at the Latest Lawsuits and Theories from The Trial Bar." In this video, she provides an overview of the panel discussion.

Source: U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
Released: Dec 16, 2011

Testimony of John Bellinger Before the House Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on "Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments"

On November 15, 2011, John B. Bellinger, III, Partner at Arnold & Porter LLP and Adjunct Senior Fellow in International and National Security Law at the Council on Foreign Relations, testified on behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform before the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law hearing on "Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments." LEARN MORE »

Download Now

Access to Justice or the Bottom Line? The Growing Commercialization of the Practice of Law

This panel at the 12th Annual Legal Reform Summit on October 26, 2011 addressed the “commercialization” of the practice of law through issues such as third-party litigation financing, where outside investors have a stake in the outcome of ligation; the new trial lawyer “bounty hunter” ads on the internet; and the growing interest in allowing investors to partner with lawyers in law firms.

Source: U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
Released: Oct 26, 2011

The Plaintiffs' Bar Goes Digital (Powerpoint presentation)

Released at the 12th Annual Legal Reform Summit, this presentation reveals the digital tactics of the trial bar -- where and how they are spending their money to advertise online.

Download Now

Lawyers Mass Tort Solicitation Advertising

Released at the 12th Annual Legal Reform Summit, this study of trial lawyer advertising found that lawyers spent $844 million on advertising in 2010 and that spending by trial lawyers has risen by an average of 8.1% a year since 2004.

Download Now

Promoting Merit in Merit Selection

Promoting Merit in Merit SelectionThe U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform examined the various state merit selection practices for fairness, effectiveness and independence. Arizona leads the nation with the procedures it has put in place to fulfill the promise of true nonpartisan “merit” selection. This document describes what we believe are the “best practices” that have come from the writings of legal experts in this area and from the real-world Arizona experience.

 

Download Now

Beyond Due Process - A Litigation Primer: Challenging Attorney General and Other Government Contingency Fee Arrangements

Beyond Due ProcessDefendants in government contingency fee lawsuits should consider a variety of non-due process “bright line” challenges to contingency fee arrangements. These include challenges based on the government’s control or lack of control of the case and whether it was brought and is being litigated in the public interest; as well as challenges based on state separation of powers provisions, government contracting laws, and laws pertaining to government employment of outside counsel. This paper highlights these challenges as well as the limitations of certain of these challenges in qui tam suits, which have been brought by private plaintiffs’ attorneys to circumvent the legal and policy issues associated with more traditional government contingency fee arrangements. Download Now