Delaware Legislature Delays Anti-Fee-Shifting Legislation
In the wake of staunch opposition from the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform and other business groups, the Delaware legislature is putting the brakes on legislation that would prevent corporate “fee-shifting” bylaws in the wake of a recent Delaware court decision allowing such bylaws.
The bill reportedly is being delayed for consideration until January 2015.
The Pipeline reports that ILR and other business groups argued the legislation "would ensure a steady stream of lawsuits in Delaware courts to the benefit of the state's lawyers and the detriment of its companies and their stockholders."
"This was a rush to judgment. That's atypical for Delaware," said ILR’s Matt Webb, who was quoted in that same Pipeline story. "The plaintiffs bar viewed this as a threat and acted accordingly. The business community views securities and M&A litigation just as strongly on the other side."
ILR had weighed in strongly when the bill was first introduced. In a letter to legislators, ILR President Lisa A. Rickard wrote that the court’s decision "gives corporations a way to protect their shareholders against these costs of abusive litigation.”
"Why would the Legislature so quickly deprive shareholders of the opportunity to obtain that protection?” she added.
ILR will continue to staunchly oppose this legislation, as well as to educate lawmakers on the negative impact this bill would have on Delaware’s business climate.
Business Insurance highlights recent Delaware legislation prohibiting corporate "fee shifting" bylaws and the impact in "addressing the rising costs of litigation associated with merger and acquisition activity." Read More »
There is growing "resistance" among Delaware Chancery Court judges to "M&A settlements in which plaintiffs grant defendants broad releases of shareholder claims in exchange for just additional disclosures in deal proxy materials." Last week, Delaware Vice-Chancellors John Noble and Travis Laster both refused to approve disclosure-only settlements, and a Fordham law professor recently filed an objection to the settlement of shareholder litigation over Thoma Bravo's $3.6 billion acquisition of Riverbed Technologies to "provoke debate" on this disclosure-only settlements. (Reuters) Read More »