The Great Myths of State False Claims Acts: Alternatives to State Qui Tam Statutes
Authored by Jonathan Diesenhaus of Hogan Lovells, this paper addresses the unexpected effects and complications from state laws that attempt to mirror the federal False Claims Act. It charts the development of state qui tam laws, outlines the challenges they present to states and defendants alike, and provides a roadmap of alternative measures to combat fraud.
On July 30, 2014, I testified before the U.S. House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice on behalf of the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform. In that hearing, I urged Members to consider relatively modest yet critical reforms to the Act. Read More »