Transnational

Lawsuits brought by plaintiffs’ class action firms, public interest attorneys, and non-governmental organizations against U.S. companies or foreign companies with a substantial U.S. presence are sometimes premised on alleged injuries that occurred abroad. Such lawsuits raise the question of whether U.S. courts should be the venue for cases concerning conduct occurring outside U.S. borders.

Some of these cases are filed in federal courts under the 200-year old Alien Tort Statute (ATS), which provides federal jurisdiction over lawsuits brought by non-U.S. nationals for torts in violation of international law. Others are brought under state common law or in foreign jurisdictions, including countries with poorly developed legal systems, only to return to courts in the United States. This practice is known as Foreign Judgement Enforcement.

This area of litigation has developed into a business for plaintiffs’ lawyers who try to cash in against multinational companies using the U.S. legal system. Many of the suits take many years, halting international investment and imposing substantial legal and reputational costs on corporations.

To prevent abusive forum shopping, federal and state courts should exercise caution in interpreting and applying state law, even state common law, and extraterritoriality. States should strengthen their foreign judgment recognition and enforcement laws and Congress should adopt uniform federal standards to govern the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.

 

Alien Tort Statute (ATS)

Enacted in 1789 as part of the Judiciary Act, the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) provides federal jurisdiction over lawsuits brought by non-U.S. nationals. The ATS was intended to give federal courts of the new nation the power to resolve disputes arising from a very limited number of international law violations, such as piracy or assaults on ambassadors on U.S. soil.

Despite its original intent, the ATS has served for the past two decades as the fountainhead of litigation against multinational companies for human rights violations allegedly committed by foreign governments or other foreign actors in countries all over the world.

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued two important opinions restricting the ATS. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013) limited its extraterritorial scope and Jesner v. Arab Bank (2018) restricted corporate liability. These rulings have substantially limited the use of the ATS in transnational cases; however, this does not deter cases brought under state common law or through foreign judgment enforcement.

Click here to read a full summary of the Nestle USA, Inc. v. Doe I (2019). or through foreign judgment enforcement.

Foreign Judgment Enforcement (FJE)

In recent years, plaintiffs have filed numerous lawsuits against businesses and individuals in U.S. courts for alleged conduct occurring outside the U.S. The Supreme Court’s recent rulings limiting such cases including Daimler AG v. Bauman (2014), Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013), and Morrison v. National Australia Bank (2010) will likely mean a new strategy for plaintiffs and their lawyers: bring lawsuits in foreign courts, attempt to enforce any judgments in those foreign courts in U.S. courts, and seize companies’ U.S. assets. This raises the troubling prospect of abusive and improper foreign judgments being enforced in the U.S.

To prevent abusive forum shopping, States should strengthen their foreign judgment recognition and enforcement laws. Congress should also adopt uniform federal standards to govern the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.

01/01/2019

Suggested Resources

Research

All Results for Transnational

  1. In the News

    September 25, 2013 | News and Blog

    A week after six lawyers left a Plaintiffs Steering Committee, a lawyer has voluntarily dropped a bellweather transvaginal mesh case against CR Bard Inc. ... Read More

  2. In the News

    September 24, 2013 | News and Blog

    On Monday, BP asked a court to halt payments from the gulf oil spill settlement fund until the administrator implements recommendations to improve efficiency and accounting controls.... Read More

  3. Should State Law Rule the World?

    September 24, 2013 | News and Blog

    Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, issued a landmark ruling that curbed a pernicious abuse of the Alien Tort Statute. ... Read More

  4. In the News

    September 23, 2013 | News and Blog

    After an Oregon state court granted jurisdiction over a U.S. company and its foreign parent, Danish company Novo Nordisk is asking the Supreme Court to clarify whether a foreign company can be held liable for products handled by the American subsidiary.... Read More

  5. In the News

    September 20, 2013 | News and Blog

    As part of its $920 million settlement with US and UK regulators, JP Morgan has agreed to an admission of wrongdoing in the "London Whale" case. ... Read More

  6. International Tribunal Rules for Chevron

    September 19, 2013 | News and Blog

    On Tuesday, an international tribunal ruled that Chevron is not liable for environmental damage claims in Ecuador.... Read More

  7. Taming Tort Tourism

    September 19, 2013 | News and Blog

    In 1895, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that judgments rendered by foreign courts could be recognized and enforced in the U.S., if the foreign court had abided by certain American standards of jurisprudence. However, this clear and effective precedent was short-lived. ... Read More

  8. In the News

    September 18, 2013 | News and Blog

    The world's biggest litigation funder, Burford Capital, announced a 41% increase in operating income from last year. Burford also disclosed it currently has $266 million invested in 29 litigation financing operations.... Read More

  9. Taming Tort Tourism: The Case for a Federal Solution to Foreign Judgment Recognition

    September 18, 2013 | Research

    When is a multi-million dollar foreign-country judgment not worth the paper it's printed on? Surprisingly, the answer depends in large part on where the judgment is enforced in the United States.... Read More

  10. Should State Law Rule the World? A Call for Caution in Applying State Law in Transnational Tort Cases

    September 18, 2013 | Research

    Corporations need to turn their attention to the application of U.S. state law in transnational tort cases following the Kiobel case. Encouraging caution on the part of federal and state courts interpreting state law and potential Congressional action is but a first step in resolving these important transnational human rights and business issues.... Read More