Securities Litigation Reform

Private securities class actions are lawsuits filed on behalf of shareholders against publicly—traded companies that allegedly defrauded their investors. Supporters of these cases claim they are necessary to compensate shareholders and deter wrongdoing by corporations. However, the primary beneficiaries of securities class actions are plaintiffs’ lawyers, not investors. At the same time, these cases threaten the health of the U.S. economy by imposing huge costs on American businesses, investors, and employees, while hurting the global competiveness of U.S. securities markets and serve as a barrier to private companies considering whether to become public. Read More...

There is enormous pressure on companies to settle securities class actions because of the burden they impose on management, the cost of going to trial, and the risk of a runaway verdict. This dynamic typically results in major settlements even when the underlying claims are of questionable merit. Even if a claim is legitimate, a settlement effectively results in one group of innocent shareholders (those who own shares at the time of the settlement) paying another group of innocent shareholders. The individuals responsible for wrongdoing rarely make a significant contribution. In addition, recoveries usually amount to just pennies on the dollar of alleged losses, while plaintiffs’ lawyers walk away with marge contingency fees. Those whom the securities class action system is supposed to protect—small, individual retail investors—are the ones who, in fact, benefit the least.

The current system is also plagued by abuse. In fact, several leading securities plaintiffs’ lawyers were sent to prison for offering bribes and kickbacks to potential plaintiffs. The integrity of the securities class action system is further undermined by a legal “pay–to–play” culture of corruption in which lawyers make political contributions to the politicians charged with deciding who will represent large public pension funds as lead plaintiffs in these suits–and thus who will collect the largest share of attorneys’ fees from future settlements.

The securities litigation system also hurts the global competitiveness of U.S. securities markets. Companies actively question whether they want to access the U.S. securities markets and expose themselves to the exceptional liability our system imposes. Furthermore, the risk of liability is something too great for companies to move from being privately held to public.  

Plaintiffs' lawyers also sue companies involved in a merger or acquisition in state courts. This lucrative form of litigation occurs because the parties to the merger want to close their deal quickly, thus allowing plaintiffs’ lawyers to hold the merger hostage through the use of multiple lawsuits. The clear majority of these suits settle quickly and, like other types of securities litigation, typically provide little or no benefit to shareholders. But the settlements do result in large fees to the plaintiffs' lawyers who filed the lawsuits. While the courts, including those in Delaware (where many publicaly traded companies are incorporated), are beginning to look unfavorably on this type of litigation, it is still an open question whether this type of spurious litigation is going to be put to a stop. 

To curb securities litigation abuses, Congress should consider commonsense reforms that would expose relationships between securities class action attorneys and plaintiffs, target “pay–to–play” conflicts between plaintiffs’ attorneys and state pension fund officials, and introduce a competitive bidding process for selecting lead plaintiffs’ attorneys in securities class actions. In addition, Congress and state legislatures should consider measures to limit forum shopping and other abuses related to mergers and acquisitions litigation.

Suggested Resources

Research

All Results for Securities Litigation Reform

  1. Chamber: FSR Study a Critical Voice in Calling for Needed Financial Industry Reforms

    November 06, 2007 | Press Release

    WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform President Lisa A. Rickard, and the U.S. Chamber Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness Executive Director Michael Ryan, released the following joint statement on the Financial Services Roundtable blue ribbon commission report (pdf) on enhancing competitiveness of the U.S. capital markets system... Read More

  2. Chamber Urges Congress, SEC to Address Competitiveness of U.S. Capital Markets and Securities Lawsuit Abuse

    June 25, 2007 | Press Release

    WASHINGTON, D.C.-The U.S. Chamber of Commerce today urged Congress and the SEC to address the challenges to the competitiveness of U.S. capital markets. The call came as the House Committee on Financial Services met to discuss the role of the SEC in investor protection and market oversight.... Read More

  3. Stoneridge Could Further Damage U.S. Competitiveness

    June 10, 2007 | Press Release

    Washington, DC-U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform President Lisa A. Rickard released the following statement on the deadline on amicus filings in support of the plaintiff's position in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta. The case, a securities class action pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, is widely viewed as precedent-setting that will determine whether or not a company can be sued simply because it did business with an alleged violator. ... Read More

  4. Chamber Encouraged by Securities Reform Hearing

    June 27, 2006 | Press Release

    Statement of Lisa A. Rickard, President of the US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, on the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Committee hearing on H.R. 5491, the "Securities Litigation Attorney Accountability and Transparency Act". "Chairman Baker's proposal to reform the securities litigation process is a needed first step in repairing a system that has become broken down due to trial lawyer fraud and abuse largely at the expense of American investors.... Read More

  5. Chamber Responds to Indictment of Milberg Weiss Law Firm

    May 18, 2006 | Press Release

    WASHINGTON, D.C. - The president of the U.S. Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform (ILR), Lisa Rickard, issued the following statement in response to today's indictment of the law firm Milberg Weiss and a number of its partners by the U.S. Attorney.s office: "The Chamber has long been concerned about the questionable practices of Milberg Weiss and has repeatedly sought an investigation into their activities by the Federal Government," said Ms. Rickard. ... Read More

  6. Securities Class Action System In Need of Repair

    February 15, 2006 | Press Release

    WASHINGTON, D.C. - The securities class action litigation system is not working the way Congress intended it to work when it passed the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) of 1995, according to a paper released today by the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR). "The PSLRA, which was designed to protect the average American investor, has been subverted by entrepreneurial plaintiffs' lawyers," said Thomas J. Donohue, President and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. "The system needs to be repaired." ... Read More

  7. The Economic Realities of Securities Class Action Litigation

    October 26, 2005 | Research

    Unlike conventional fraud claims, which seek to disgorge wrongful gains from the perpetrator of the fraud, securities class action claims usually entail situations in which the supposed illicit gains are received by innocent investors, who sold securities at allegedly inflated prices, rather than by the company officials who allegedly committed the fraud.... Read More

  8. Chamber Report: Securities Class Action System Out of Kilter

    October 25, 2005 | Press Release

    WASHINGTON, D.C. - A U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) study of the securities class action litigation system shows that there is a substantial disconnect between what the system is supposed to do in terms of compensating investors and what it actually does. The report was released today as part of ILR's 6th Annual Legal Reform Summit. ... Read More